Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Topics in Early Childhood Special Education
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schutter, L. S.
Right arrow Articles by Brinker, R. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Conjuring a New Category of Disability from Prenatal Cocaine Exposure

Are the Infants Unique Biological or Caretaking Casualties?

Linda S. Schutter

University of Illinois at Chicago

Richard P. Brinker

University of Illinois at Chicago

The paper reviews the available literature on the biological mechanisms and effects of cocaine exposure impacting pregnant women, the fetus, the neonate, and the infant. The potential causal mechanisms for neural damage to the fetus are quite robust; however, the empirical literature does not support an inevitable developmental consequence for infants exposed in utero to cocaine. The most impaired of the cocaine-exposed infants do not seem to differ, behaviorally, from other groups of neurologically impaired infants. However, the infant exposed to cocaine in utero may have the added disadvantage of a dysfunctional caregiving environment focused more on drug habit maintenance than on caretaking. This combination of biological vulnerability and caretaking inadequacy increases the odds that a child will be a "caretaking casualty." Classifications of children are useful only if they organize and name individuals with the same biological or behavioral characteristics. The classification of infants and young children as prenatally cocaine-exposed does not constitute a coherent cluster of either biological or behavioral characteristics. Hence, the construct of "cocaine babies" that has received considerable attention in the popular and professional press is neither descriptive nor predictive of behavior. Recommendations are offered for classification of behavior rather than labeling of the child. In addition, an overview of types of early intervention appropriate for various kinds of behavior exhibited by some children exposed to cocaine is presented. Finally, the development of empowerment strategies and professional partnerships with families of infants exposed to cocaine in utero is discussed.

Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, Vol. 11, No. 4, 84-111 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/027112149201100409


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Early InterventionHome page
R. B. Krauss, S. K. Thurman, N. Brodsky, L. Betancourt, J. Giannetta, and H. Hurt
Caregiver Interaction Behavior With Prenatally Cocaine-Exposed and Nonexposed Preschoolers
Journal of Early Intervention, January 1, 2000; 23(1): 62 - 73.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban EducationHome page
D. Barone
"Be Very Careful Not to Let the Facts Get Mixed Up with the Truth": Children Prenatally Exposed to Crack/Cocaine
Urban Education, April 1, 1995; 30(1): 40 - 55.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Early InterventionHome page
J. K. CHAPMAN and R. N. ELLIOTT
Preschoolers Exposed to Cocaine: Early Childhood Special Education and Head Start Preparation
Journal of Early Intervention, January 1, 1995; 19(2): 118 - 129.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Early InterventionHome page
S. K. Thurman, R. A. Brobeil, J. P. DuCette, and H. Hurt
Prenatally Exposed to Cocaine: Does the Label Matter?
Journal of Early Intervention, January 1, 1994; 18(2): 119 - 130.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Topics in Early Childhood Special EducationHome page
J. J. Carta, G. Sideridis, P. Rinkel, S. Guimaraes, C. Greenwood, K. Baggett, P. Peterson, J. Atwater, M. McEvoy, and S. McConnell
Behavioral Outcomes of Young Children Prenatally Exposed to Illicit Drugs: Review and Analysis of Experimental Literature
Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, January 1, 1994; 14(2): 184 - 216.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Topics in Early Childhood Special EducationHome page
S. R. Gottwald and S. K. Thurman
The Effects of Prenatal Cocaine Exposure on Mother--Infant Interaction and Infant Arousal in the Newborn Period
Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, January 1, 1994; 14(2): 217 - 231.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Topics in Early Childhood Special EducationHome page
J. R. VanBremen and I. J. Chasnoff
Policy Issues for Integrating Parenting Interventions and Addiction Treatment for Women
Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, January 1, 1994; 14(2): 254 - 274.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Topics in Early Childhood Special EducationHome page
R. P. Brinker
Family Involvement in Early Intervention: Accepting the Unchangeable, Changing the Changeable, and Knowing the Difference
Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, January 1, 1992; 12(3): 307 - 332.
[Abstract] [PDF]