|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Conjuring a New Category of Disability from Prenatal Cocaine ExposureAre the Infants Unique Biological or Caretaking Casualties?
Linda S. Schutter
University of Illinois at Chicago
Richard P. Brinker
University of Illinois at Chicago
The paper reviews the available literature on the biological mechanisms and effects of cocaine exposure impacting pregnant women, the fetus, the neonate, and the infant. The potential causal mechanisms for neural damage to the fetus are quite robust; however, the empirical literature does not support an inevitable developmental consequence for infants exposed in utero to cocaine. The most impaired of the cocaine-exposed infants do not seem to differ, behaviorally, from other groups of neurologically impaired infants. However, the infant exposed to cocaine in utero may have the added disadvantage of a dysfunctional caregiving environment focused more on drug habit maintenance than on caretaking. This combination of biological vulnerability and caretaking inadequacy increases the odds that a child will be a "caretaking casualty." Classifications of children are useful only if they organize and name individuals with the same biological or behavioral characteristics. The classification of infants and young children as prenatally cocaine-exposed does not constitute a coherent cluster of either biological or behavioral characteristics. Hence, the construct of "cocaine babies" that has received considerable attention in the popular and professional press is neither descriptive nor predictive of behavior. Recommendations are offered for classification of behavior rather than labeling of the child. In addition, an overview of types of early intervention appropriate for various kinds of behavior exhibited by some children exposed to cocaine is presented. Finally, the development of empowerment strategies and professional partnerships with families of infants exposed to cocaine in utero is discussed.
Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, Vol. 11, No. 4,
84-111 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/027112149201100409

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. B. Krauss, S. K. Thurman, N. Brodsky, L. Betancourt, J. Giannetta, and H. Hurt
Caregiver Interaction Behavior With Prenatally Cocaine-Exposed and Nonexposed Preschoolers
Journal of Early Intervention,
January 1, 2000;
23(1):
62 - 73.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Barone
"Be Very Careful Not to Let the Facts Get Mixed Up with the Truth": Children Prenatally Exposed to Crack/Cocaine
Urban Education,
April 1, 1995;
30(1):
40 - 55.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. K. CHAPMAN and R. N. ELLIOTT
Preschoolers Exposed to Cocaine: Early Childhood Special Education and Head Start Preparation
Journal of Early Intervention,
January 1, 1995;
19(2):
118 - 129.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. K. Thurman, R. A. Brobeil, J. P. DuCette, and H. Hurt
Prenatally Exposed to Cocaine: Does the Label Matter?
Journal of Early Intervention,
January 1, 1994;
18(2):
119 - 130.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. J. Carta, G. Sideridis, P. Rinkel, S. Guimaraes, C. Greenwood, K. Baggett, P. Peterson, J. Atwater, M. McEvoy, and S. McConnell
Behavioral Outcomes of Young Children Prenatally Exposed to Illicit Drugs: Review and Analysis of Experimental Literature
Topics in Early Childhood Special Education,
January 1, 1994;
14(2):
184 - 216.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. R. Gottwald and S. K. Thurman
The Effects of Prenatal Cocaine Exposure on Mother--Infant Interaction and Infant Arousal in the Newborn Period
Topics in Early Childhood Special Education,
January 1, 1994;
14(2):
217 - 231.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. R. VanBremen and I. J. Chasnoff
Policy Issues for Integrating Parenting Interventions and Addiction Treatment for Women
Topics in Early Childhood Special Education,
January 1, 1994;
14(2):
254 - 274.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. P. Brinker
Family Involvement in Early Intervention: Accepting the Unchangeable, Changing the Changeable, and Knowing the Difference
Topics in Early Childhood Special Education,
January 1, 1992;
12(3):
307 - 332.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|