Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Topics in Early Childhood Special Education
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Diamond, K. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Evaluating Preschool Children's Sensitivity to Developmental Differences in Their Peers

Karen E. Diamond

Purdue University

Two studies were conducted using an adaptation of Harter and Pike's (1984) Pictorial Scale of Perceived Competence and Social Acceptance for Young Children. The scale was used to explore preschool children's sensitivity to disabilities in their peers. In the first study, children between 3.5 years and 5.5 years of age used this measure to rate their older and younger classmates' cognitive, language, and physical competence, and peer acceptance. Construct validity and test-retest reliability were psychometrically acceptable. In a second study, this measure was used to explore the ways in which preschool children without disabilities think about the skills of their classmates with disabilities. As a group, children with disabilities were viewed as less competent on developmental tasks than their classmates without disabilities. However, different patterns of competence ratings emerged for children with different disabilities. Although additional research is required to validate the utility of this measure, these data provide preliminary evidence that this instrument may prove useful in identifying the cues that young children use as they are developing an understanding of their peers' capabilities.

Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, Vol. 14, No. 1, 49-63 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/027112149401400107


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Young Exceptional ChildrenHome page
J. Han, M. M. Ostrosky, and K. E. Diamond
Children's Attitudes Toward Peers With Disabilities: Supporting Positive Attitude Development
Young Exceptional Children, October 1, 2006; 10(1): 2 - 11.
[PDF]


Home page
Topics in Early Childhood Special EducationHome page
K. E. Diamond
Relationships Among Young Children's Ideas, Emotional Understanding, and Social Contact with Classmates with Disabilities
Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, January 1, 2001; 21(2): 104 - 113.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Topics in Early Childhood Special EducationHome page
K. E. Diamond, L. L. Hestenes, E. S. Carpenter, and F. K. Innes
Relationships Between Enrollment in an Inclusive Class and Preschool Children's Ideas about People with Disabilities
Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, January 1, 1997; 17(4): 520 - 536.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Topics in Early Childhood Special EducationHome page
K. E. Diamond and L. L. Hestenes
Preschool Children's Conceptions of Disabilities: The Salience of Disability in Children's Ideas About Others
Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, January 1, 1996; 16(4): 458 - 475.
[Abstract] [PDF]