Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Topics in Early Childhood Special Education
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bell, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Barnett, D. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Peer Micronorms in the Assessment of Young Children

Methodological Review and Examples

Susan H. Bell

Georgetown College

David W. Barnett

University of Cincinnati

Results from norm-referenced instruments have been the standard for making important decisions in the lives of young children. However, serious concerns have surrounded the use of discrepancy scores to determine developmental delays and their utility for goal setting and intervention development. In response to these concerns, a number of assessment models have proposed the use of local or classroom norms for goal development, instructional design, progress monitoring, and eligibility determination. We outline the rationale, critical dimensions, and techniques for using peer micronorms and discuss technical adequacy considerations. Case examples of the use of peer micronorms with preschool children, supplemented with hypothetical data, are used to illustrate the technique.

Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, Vol. 19, No. 2, 112-122 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/027112149901900205


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Early InterventionHome page
J. Grisham-Brown, R. A. Hallam, and K. Pretti-Frontczak
Preparing Head Start Personnel to Use a Curriculum-Based Assessment: An Innovative Practice in the "Age of Accountability"
Journal of Early Intervention, September 1, 2008; 30(4): 271 - 281.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Special EducationHome page
D. W. Barnett, E. J. Daly III, K. M. Jones, and F. E. Lentz Jr
Response to Intervention: Empirically Based Special Service Decisions From Single-Case Designs of Increasing and Decreasing Intensity
Journal of Special Education, August 1, 2004; 38(2): 66 - 79.
[Abstract] [PDF]