Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Topics in Early Childhood Special Education
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Danaher, J.
Right arrow Articles by Harbin, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Revisiting a Comparison of Eligibility Policies for Infant/Toddler Programs and Preschool Special Education Programs

Joan Danaher

FPG Child Development Institute The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, joan_danaher{at}unc.edu

Jo Shackelford

FPG Child Development Institute The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Gloria Harbin

FPG Child Development Institute The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

In this study, the authors repeated an earlier analysis and comparison of state eligibility policies under the Infants and Toddlers with Disabilities Program, Part C of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), and the preschool special education program, Part B, Section 619, of IDEA. The impact of federal and state policy changes in the intervening years on the prospects for continuity of eligibility as children move from Part C to Part B was investigated. The analysis revealed fewer states in which discontinuity was a concern (21, down from 27). States in which continuity was either "very likely" or "somewhat likely" increased from 24 to 30. The authors discuss policy options affecting continuity of eligibility across the early childhood programs of IDEA and the relevance of their findings for realizing the purposes of IDEA.

Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, Vol. 24, No. 2, 59-67 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/02711214040240020101


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Early InterventionHome page
M. G. Macy, D. D. Bricker, and J. K. Squires
Validity and Reliability of a Curriculum-Based Assessment Approach to Determine Eligibility for Part C Services
Journal of Early Intervention, October 1, 2005; 28(1): 1 - 16.
[Abstract] [PDF]