|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
The Effectiveness of Parental Screening of At-Risk InfantsThe Infant Monitoring Questionnaires
Diane Bricker
Jane Squires
University of Oregon
This study examined the validity, reliability, and cost of a parent-completed screening system called the Infant Monitoring Questionnaires. This system relies on parents to complete developmental questionnaires on their at-risk infants at specific time intervals. The present work replicated and extended a previous study of the questionnaires. The primary analyses included determining (a) the agreement between the infant's classification based on the parent-completed questionnaire and a criterion measure (e.g., Bayley Scales of Infant Development, Stanford-Binet Intelligence Test, Revised Gesell Developmental Schedules); (b) interobserver and test-retest reliability of the questionnaires; and (c) the cost of the questionnaire system. The results indicated that percentage agreement between classifications of infants made using the standardized tests and the questionnaires was high, ranging from 86% to 91%. Underscreening rates were low, ranging from zero to 6%; overscreening rates were also low, ranging from 3% to 11%. Interobserver and test-retest agreement were very high. At a cost of about $2.50 per questionnaire, the screening system provides an economical and flexible means of screening at-risk infants while at the same time involving parents in the assessment process.
Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, Vol. 9, No. 3,
67-85 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/027112148900900306

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Skarakis-Doyle, W. Campbell, and L. Dempsey
Identification of Children With Language Impairment: Investigating the Classification Accuracy of the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories, Level III
Am J Speech Lang Pathol,
August 1, 2009;
18(3):
277 - 288.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H.-L. A. Tsai, M. M. McClelland, C. Pratt, and J. Squires
Adaptation of the 36-Month Ages and Stages Questionnaire in Taiwan: Results From a Preliminary Study
Journal of Early Intervention,
April 1, 2006;
28(3):
213 - 225.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Committee on Children With Disabilities
Developmental Surveillance and Screening of Infants and Young Children
Pediatrics,
July 1, 2001;
108(1):
192 - 195.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. A. Boone and E. Crais
Strategies for Achieving: Family Driven Assessment and Intervention Planning
Young Exceptional Children,
December 1, 1999;
3(1):
2 - 11.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. A. Dinnebeil and S. Rule
Congruence Between Parentsapos; and Professionals' Judgments About the Development of Young Children with Disabilities: A Review of the Literature
Topics in Early Childhood Special Education,
January 1, 1994;
14(1):
1 - 25.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. W. Henderson and S. J. Meisels
Parental Involvement in the Developmental Screening of Their Young Children: A Multiple-Source Perspective
Journal of Early Intervention,
January 1, 1994;
18(2):
141 - 154.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. E. Diamond
The Role of Parents' Observations and Concerns in Screening for Developmental Delays in Young Children
Topics in Early Childhood Special Education,
January 1, 1993;
13(1):
68 - 81.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. E. DIAMOND and J. SQUIRES
The Role of Parental Report in the Screening and Assessment of Young Children
Journal of Early Intervention,
January 1, 1993;
17(2):
107 - 115.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. SQUIRES and D. BRICKER
Impact of Completing Infant Developmental Questionnaires on At-Risk Mothers
Journal of Early Intervention,
January 1, 1991;
15(2):
162 - 172.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|