Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Topics in Early Childhood Special Education
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bricker, D.
Right arrow Articles by Squires, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Effectiveness of Parental Screening of At-Risk Infants

The Infant Monitoring Questionnaires

Diane Bricker

Jane Squires

University of Oregon

This study examined the validity, reliability, and cost of a parent-completed screening system called the Infant Monitoring Questionnaires. This system relies on parents to complete developmental questionnaires on their at-risk infants at specific time intervals. The present work replicated and extended a previous study of the questionnaires. The primary analyses included determining (a) the agreement between the infant's classification based on the parent-completed questionnaire and a criterion measure (e.g., Bayley Scales of Infant Development, Stanford-Binet Intelligence Test, Revised Gesell Developmental Schedules); (b) interobserver and test-retest reliability of the questionnaires; and (c) the cost of the questionnaire system. The results indicated that percentage agreement between classifications of infants made using the standardized tests and the questionnaires was high, ranging from 86% to 91%. Underscreening rates were low, ranging from zero to 6%; overscreening rates were also low, ranging from 3% to 11%. Interobserver and test-retest agreement were very high. At a cost of about $2.50 per questionnaire, the screening system provides an economical and flexible means of screening at-risk infants while at the same time involving parents in the assessment process.

Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, Vol. 9, No. 3, 67-85 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/027112148900900306


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AJSLPHome page
E. Skarakis-Doyle, W. Campbell, and L. Dempsey
Identification of Children With Language Impairment: Investigating the Classification Accuracy of the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories, Level III
Am J Speech Lang Pathol, August 1, 2009; 18(3): 277 - 288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Early InterventionHome page
H.-L. A. Tsai, M. M. McClelland, C. Pratt, and J. Squires
Adaptation of the 36-Month Ages and Stages Questionnaire in Taiwan: Results From a Preliminary Study
Journal of Early Intervention, April 1, 2006; 28(3): 213 - 225.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
Committee on Children With Disabilities
Developmental Surveillance and Screening of Infants and Young Children
Pediatrics, July 1, 2001; 108(1): 192 - 195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Young Exceptional ChildrenHome page
H. A. Boone and E. Crais
Strategies for Achieving: Family Driven Assessment and Intervention Planning
Young Exceptional Children, December 1, 1999; 3(1): 2 - 11.
[PDF]


Home page
Topics in Early Childhood Special EducationHome page
L. A. Dinnebeil and S. Rule
Congruence Between Parentsapos; and Professionals' Judgments About the Development of Young Children with Disabilities: A Review of the Literature
Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, January 1, 1994; 14(1): 1 - 25.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Early InterventionHome page
L. W. Henderson and S. J. Meisels
Parental Involvement in the Developmental Screening of Their Young Children: A Multiple-Source Perspective
Journal of Early Intervention, January 1, 1994; 18(2): 141 - 154.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Topics in Early Childhood Special EducationHome page
K. E. Diamond
The Role of Parents' Observations and Concerns in Screening for Developmental Delays in Young Children
Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, January 1, 1993; 13(1): 68 - 81.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Early InterventionHome page
K. E. DIAMOND and J. SQUIRES
The Role of Parental Report in the Screening and Assessment of Young Children
Journal of Early Intervention, January 1, 1993; 17(2): 107 - 115.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Early InterventionHome page
J. SQUIRES and D. BRICKER
Impact of Completing Infant Developmental Questionnaires on At-Risk Mothers
Journal of Early Intervention, January 1, 1991; 15(2): 162 - 172.
[Abstract] [PDF]